Timeline for Key scheduling for ISAAC
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2020 at 1:25 | answer | added | Future Security | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 18:09 | comment | added | Mini kute | Ok can i edit my question further and generalize it for key scheduling. | |
| Feb 29, 2020 at 12:40 | history | edited | SEJPM | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited in reference, not everybody knows ISAAC
|
| S Feb 29, 2020 at 4:11 | history | suggested | Patriot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
acronym; punctuation; added a tag
|
| Feb 29, 2020 at 3:07 | comment | added | Future Security | ISAAC just isn't an algorithm that anyone qualified to work on cryptography would call "safe". Though I'm not aware of published attacks, we have higher standards. We want supporting evidence that an algorithm is safe, not an absence of evidence that it's unsafe. There is no reason to use it, anyway, because serious modern algorithms are more efficient and safer compared to ISAAC. | |
| Feb 29, 2020 at 1:37 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 29, 2020 at 4:11 | |||||
| Feb 28, 2020 at 21:30 | history | asked | Mini kute | CC BY-SA 4.0 |