Skip to main content
Cryptography

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackCrypto/status/122839428313006081
add titles of these papers
Source Link
Paŭlo Ebermann
Paŭlo Ebermann
  • 22.8k
  • 7
  • 81
  • 118

Two highly-critical papers by Koblitz and Menezes (two well-regarded mathematicians who've contributed to the crypto community) were published years ago: one in 2004Another Look at “Provable Security” in 2004, another in 2006Another Look at “Provable Security”. II in 2006.

Have these papers had any noticeable impact on how research is conducted in the provable-security community? Or have these papers largely been ignored?

Two highly-critical papers by Koblitz and Menezes (two well-regarded mathematicians who've contributed to the crypto community) were published years ago: one in 2004, another in 2006.

Have these papers had any noticeable impact on how research is conducted in the provable-security community? Or have these papers largely been ignored?

Two highly-critical papers by Koblitz and Menezes (two well-regarded mathematicians who've contributed to the crypto community) were published years ago: Another Look at “Provable Security” in 2004, Another Look at “Provable Security”. II in 2006.

Have these papers had any noticeable impact on how research is conducted in the provable-security community? Or have these papers largely been ignored?

Source Link
Fixee
Fixee
  • 4.2k
  • 3
  • 26
  • 39

How did the Koblitz/Menezes papers affect the cryptography community?

Two highly-critical papers by Koblitz and Menezes (two well-regarded mathematicians who've contributed to the crypto community) were published years ago: one in 2004, another in 2006.

Have these papers had any noticeable impact on how research is conducted in the provable-security community? Or have these papers largely been ignored?