Timeline for Why using hash trees instead using a single hash value?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 10, 2022 at 20:53 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
A visit after a new upvote, an is forgotten
|
Dec 21, 2020 at 12:45 | comment | added | kelalaka | Yes, That is the point. | |
Dec 21, 2020 at 12:37 | comment | added | funidentifier | Thanks for your answer. Whether the tree is binary or not, I think that the point of "efficient verifications" still hold. Am I right? | |
Dec 21, 2020 at 12:36 | vote | accept | funidentifier | ||
Dec 21, 2020 at 1:25 | comment | added | kelalaka | @funidentifier There are works in Academia about those, Obviously, the depth of the tree is decreased, however, one will need more siblings than the depth. One needs to look at each case. Note that by Definition a Merkle Tree is Binary Tree. | |
Dec 21, 2020 at 1:12 | comment | added | funidentifier | But this way you're assuming that the tree is binary. What if the tree is not binary? | |
S Dec 20, 2020 at 13:49 | history | suggested | wizzwizz4 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed broken formatting.
|
Dec 20, 2020 at 13:38 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 20, 2020 at 13:49 | |||||
Dec 20, 2020 at 13:24 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
Dec 20, 2020 at 13:18 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 42 characters in body
|
Dec 20, 2020 at 13:06 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
polish
|
Dec 19, 2020 at 23:17 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 19, 2020 at 22:51 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
polish
|
Dec 19, 2020 at 22:39 | history | edited | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
polish
|
Dec 19, 2020 at 22:16 | comment | added | kelalaka | Whoever upvotes this answer, please go and read and upvote the Squamish's amazing answer, too. It is linked. | |
Dec 19, 2020 at 22:12 | history | answered | kelalaka | CC BY-SA 4.0 |