Skip to main content
replaced http://crypto.stackexchange.com/ with https://crypto.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

Adding to David Cash's answerDavid Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improves OAEP using only a one-round Feistel structure and has an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improves OAEP using only a one-round Feistel structure and has an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improves OAEP using only a one-round Feistel structure and has an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

English; added link to paper
Source Link
Ilmari Karonen
  • 46.5k
  • 5
  • 111
  • 187

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improvedimproves OAEP using only a one-round FeistalFeistel structure and withhas an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improved OAEP using only one-round Feistal structure and with an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improves OAEP using only a one-round Feistel structure and has an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

Addendum:

RecentlyAdding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by BOneh [1]Boneh, there is another paper that improved the OAEP using only one round feistal's-round Feistal structure and with an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption as oppose to(which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have).

U can refer to Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012) verified security of redundancy-free encryption from rabin and rsa.

Addendum:

Recently, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by BOneh [1], there is another paper improved the OAEP using only one round feistal's structure and with additional feature: redundancy-free encryption as oppose to OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+.

U can refer to Barthe, Poitcheval Beguelin (2012) verified security of redundancy-free encryption from rabin and rsa.

Adding to David Cash's answer, besides SAEP and SAEP+ by Boneh, there is another paper that improved OAEP using only one-round Feistal structure and with an additional feature: redundancy-free encryption (which none of OAEP, SAEP and SAEP+ have). Read Verified Security of Redundancy-Free Encryption from Rabin and RSA by Barthe, Poitcheval and Beguelin (2012).

added 121 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading