No.
Some clarification: SP 800-90A -> Recommendation for Random Number Generation Using Deterministic Random Bit Generators, as per your "DRBG" quotation. Yet your example is a TRNG covered by SP 800-90B -> Recommendation for the Entropy Sources Used for Random Bit Generation. But only in America. NIST does not have a monopoly on entropy nor random numbers.
The security strength of a TRNG is measured by the final output bias given that:-
$$ H_{out} \ngtr H_{in} $$
So post extraction, your 4 bit entropy source emerges with much better randomness, and a bias away from perfection bounded by the Leftover Hash Lemma:-
$$ \epsilon = 2^{-(sn-k)/2} $$
where we have $n$ = input bits at $s$ bits/bit of raw entropy from the source, $k$ is the number of output bits from the extractor (and ideally $\ll sn$). $\epsilon$ is the bias away from a perfectly uniform $k$ bit length string, i.e. $H(k) = 1 - \epsilon$ bits/bit. NIST accepts that $\epsilon < 2^{-64}$ for cryptographic applications.
Your $\epsilon \approx 2^{-272}$. So not bad assuming that your source does indeed produce 0.5 bits/bit of true entropy at all working temperatures.