The prover has $n$ group elements $g_1, ..., g_n$ and wishes to demonstrate the knowledge of the discrete logarithm to base $g$ for each of them, i.e, for each $i \in [1,n]$ she knows some $e_i$ s.t. $g_i = g^{e_i}$. We know that by applying Fiat-Shamir to the Schnorr's protocol, we can get $n$ non-interactive proofs in the form of $(R_i, c_i, s_i)$ where $c_i$ is the hash of $(g_i, R_i)$.
The question is: can we use a same challenge $c$ which is defined as: $c = hash((R_1,..., R_n), (g_1, ..., g_n))$? Each proof will look like $(R_i, c, s_i)$ sharing the same $c$. Would that change the soundness of the scheme? I vaguely feel that this may work through correlation intractability?