2
$\begingroup$
  1. If we have a scheme for inner product predicate encryption (IPPE), then can we claim that we already have designed an attribute based encryption (ABE) scheme; So we do not need to design an ABE again. I mean, is IPPE more general than ABE?
  2. What about predicate encryption (PE)? I think PE is more general than ABE, Right?
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

We should consider two things:

  • public/private index (attribute)
  • expressiveness of the access strucrure

We can look at IPPE as ABE with hidden indices for access structures represented by inner product of two vectors. So IPPE is a special case of ABE with hidden indices.

In PE, indices (i.e. attributes) are hidden, and we also need different security model; simulation-based security instead of indistinguishability-based security. (It can be shown that there are PE schemes which are IND-secure but aren't SIM-secure)

So, IPPE is a subclass of ABE with hidden indices, and ABE is a subclass of PE.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.