1
$\begingroup$

I'm currently studying the possibility of a novel ransomware technique, where an adversary instead of forcing the victim to pay a ransom, forces them to brute force a key of given length and thus spend a lot of computational power.

However before beginning the victim would need some assurance that recovery is actually possible with their given means.

I've considered the case where you give the victim a partial key used by a well known block cipher in combination with a way of verifying that the partial key is correct. However a "partial key oracle" would clearly compromise the scheme, since the victim could query the oracle and guess the key bit by bit in linear time.

So I'm looking for an algorithm that allows for a variable key-length (preferably down to bit-level, so the attack can be tuned to the victims capabilities) and a way to prove from the ciphertext/AD that the key had a certain length.

If anyone knows of such a scheme or can give me some more insight into how it can be accomplished (if at all possible), I'd be very grateful.

I would also like to note that this is only meant for academic purposes and I will not implement or use this for malicious purposes.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ TIme lock puzzle can solve this, though. Also, just release 88-bit AES-128 key and let them compute 40-bit space with some known-plaintext? $\endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    Commented Sep 14, 2023 at 13:43
  • $\begingroup$ But if they have no way of knowing/verifying that the released partial key was a part the the key used to encrypt the data, then the scheme falls apart. It would be a way to do it, but who's going to trust a ransomware actor? But I'll look into the time-release crypto you referenced. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14, 2023 at 13:58
  • $\begingroup$ who's going to trust a ransomware actor Many did and payed for their data. They are for money not for destruction or torture. They can write a small note about the puzzle/computation to be held so that you can try it with an off-line system. This style no longer can be called ransomware, it is like computationware $\endgroup$
    – kelalaka
    Commented Sep 14, 2023 at 14:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This sounds like a scenario where a witness from arguments/proofs of knowledge might be able to attest that a particular computation (encryption) operation was done, without revealing the plaintext or key. I am not well versed enough to give an explanation for how it works, though. $\endgroup$
    – aiootp
    Commented Sep 15, 2023 at 0:43
  • $\begingroup$ @aiootp this seems very promising! I'll look into it. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 15, 2023 at 8:26

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.