1
$\begingroup$

I need to extend the TLS protocol to be able to use other key exchange scheme based on elliptic curves. I am planning to use BouncyCastle's implementation in Java and in .NET.

I am worring about timing attacks against the ECC key exchange scheme. Is BouncyCastle prone to timing attacks? Is there a way to use it to implement operations in data-independent time?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by e-sushi Jul 30 '17 at 11:13

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Programming questions are off-topic even if you are writing or debugging cryptographic code. Unless your question is specifically about how the cryptographic algorithm or protocol works, you should look into asking on Stack Overflow instead." – e-sushi
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Depends on how you use them. You'll have to describe the app and how the crypto is to be used. $\endgroup$ – mikeazo Oct 6 '13 at 19:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ These are large libraries, some parts my be better than others. At least the ECC part looks vulnerable to timing attacks to me. $\endgroup$ – CodesInChaos Oct 6 '13 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ If I'll use the Bouncy Castle for building client applications which connects whith server using TLS base on ECC key exchange scheme. Will be it secure? $\endgroup$ – NiceTheo Oct 6 '13 at 19:34
  • $\begingroup$ "Secure…" compared to what? I would say that — in it's current form — the question is a bit too broad. Maybe you can edit your question and describe what exactly you are worrying about, or what specific security parameters you want to evaluate… including a small mention of what other solution you want a "security" comparison to. $\endgroup$ – e-sushi Oct 6 '13 at 20:49
  • $\begingroup$ To expand on e-sushi's comment, do you mean if they are known to have been compromized in some way? $\endgroup$ – rath Oct 6 '13 at 23:23