0
$\begingroup$

I am a student taking a cryptography course so forgive me if this comes off as a silly question. This is an assignment question:

Alice ------R--------> Bob
Alice <-----[R]B------ Bob
Alice ------[R+1]A---> Bob

Why doesn't this protocol provide mutual authentication?

Here's a plausible scenario Alice sends R trudy intercepts it and sends it to bob impersonating alice. Bob sends back R signed by him to trudy. Trudy now impersonates Bob and sends R with Bob's signature to Alice impersonating Bob. alice sends [R+1] signed by alice which trudy can now use to impersonate as Alice to Bob.

If that is a valid attack. Wouldn't this work with every protocol? After all we're merely just relaying message back and forth among two parties. Is there any way I can modify this to get mutual authentication?

$\endgroup$

merged by mikeazo Dec 5 '13 at 15:27

This question was merged with Why doesn't this dummy mutual authentication protocol provide mutual authentication? because it is an exact duplicate of that question.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.