Your calculations are correct. The 2nd table has 2 entries of 6 in its DDT, and 18 entries of 4. The Hamsi s-box has 24 entries of 4.
What can you infer from these tables? First off, CryptWizard001 is a liar. Second, the larger the max value in the DDT, the more vulnerable the s-box is to differential cryptanalysis, therefore the modified s-box does not have better differential properties.
For reference, here are the DDTs for both:
Hamsi
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 4 2
0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 0
0 4 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
0 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 4 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 2
0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 2
0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0
0 4 0 0 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 2
0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 4 2 0
0 4 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 4 2 0
0 0 4 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0
Note I have left the upper left entry as 0, as it has a value of 16 and is ignored during analysis.
Modified
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 2 0 2
0 4 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
0 0 0 2 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 2
0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 0
0 2 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2
0 0 0 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 2
0 0 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 0
0 0 2 4 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
0 0 6 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0
0 4 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 4 2 2 0 0
0 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
0 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2 4 2 0 2 0