3
$\begingroup$

There is a very similar question (Using a derived key for CMAC) but it doesn't quite answer this one (at least for me it does not).

I have a situation where I need to transfer some data. My data has variable length (but padded to 16-byte blocks, of course) and I encrypt it using AES-128 in CBC mode. It is done like this:

  1. I first prepend the data with last 16 bytes of previous ciphertext I sent out, append data if it needs to round to 16 byte block, and then finally encrypt it. Therefore my plaintext looks like this: [random_16_bytes_as_IV] [DATA] [PADDING]
  2. Then I calculate AES-CMAC over the entire ciphertext (using the same key used for encryption) and append it to the ciphertext and finally transmit to the receiver. So my transmission looks like this: [CIPHERTEXT] [CMAC]
  3. Receiver receives, verifies the AES-CMAC, decrypts and discards first 16 bytes of IV and whatever was appended for 16-byte block padding.

A while ago it was suggested to me to use AES in CBC mode along with CMAC for a pet-project I am working on (Is this an acceptable implementation of ARC4 encryption for my system?) and now I wanted to check if this is the right way to do it. Even though it is a pet-project I should at least give my best to do it correctly.

My concerns are bolded above. Also, please note that those 16 bytes that I prepend are actually the AES-CMAC of preious transmission, maybe I should not use those 16 bytes but use the last 16 bytes of actual ciphertext instead? - or it doesn't matter since they are both known from previous transmission...

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Why does IV go into the plaintext? $\;$ $\endgroup$
    – user991
    Commented Dec 12, 2014 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ From my understanding, the receiving side needs to know the IV used for encryption. Since I don't know how to tell receiver what IV was used to encrypt, he would not be able to decrypt properly. That's why I add these 16 bytes to plaintext to always get different ciphertext after encrypting, and fix the actual IV of AES algorithm to all zeroes. $\endgroup$
    – traxonja
    Commented Dec 13, 2014 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ ... Just concatenate the IV with the rest of the ciphertext. $\;$ $\endgroup$
    – user991
    Commented Dec 13, 2014 at 7:42
  • $\begingroup$ Hm, OK I will make that change. After that, is everything else safe, the rest of the method? Am I giving away some information by using the same key for AES-CBC encryption and AES-CMAC? $\endgroup$
    – traxonja
    Commented Dec 13, 2014 at 7:44
  • $\begingroup$ Having said that, I'm now wondering if maybe your approach is more secure than the usual one. $\hspace{.6 in}$ $\endgroup$
    – user991
    Commented Dec 13, 2014 at 8:01

1 Answer 1

7
$\begingroup$

The answer is simple. The recommandations of all experts in this case is to dissociate Keys used for Encryption from Keys used for MAC-ing. Then you have to use two different Keys.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I will accept this answer simply because said above is correct, even though it doesn't answer all my questions. Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – traxonja
    Commented Jan 9, 2015 at 10:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.