1
$\begingroup$

I'm having trouble with the following question:

  1. $X(A) \rightarrow B:(A,N_X)$
  2. $B \rightarrow X(S):(B,((A,N_X,T_B),K_{BS}),N_B)$
  3. $X(A) \rightarrow B:(((A,N_X,T_B),K_{BS}),(N_B,N_X))$

Give two very good reasons why this attack works, in terms of the properties of the messages being exchanged and their content.

$X$ is the attacker in this case.

$A$ and $B$ are the names of two agents, $S$ is the name of a trusted server, $N_X$ denotes a nonce created by entity $X$, $T_X$ denotes a timestamp created by entity $X$, $K_{XY}$ denotes a key shared between entities $X$ and $Y$

If anyone can help at all, I would greatly appreciate someone going through this question with me step by step.

From this I have understood that $B$ relays the encrypted message back and thinks everything is okay. The attacker doesn’t care about verifying the message. It gets the key and communicates with $B$ where $B$ thinks it is $A$ who has got the key through the server.

I just want to make sure that i have understood it correctly.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I think it would help if you explained the notation used in the question. As is it does not make much sense to me at least, and I am afraid others might have the same problem. $\endgroup$ – Guut Boy Dec 18 '14 at 19:16
  • $\begingroup$ @GuutBoy Updated it explaining the values, sorry about that. $\endgroup$ – Bimal Dec 18 '14 at 19:22
  • $\begingroup$ I suppose it helps a little but it still does not make a lot of sense to me. What does the arrows mean? What does X(A) mean? What is the protocol (assuming we are talking about a protocol) supposed to do? Try to imagine someone who did not take the course you are taking/read the book you are reading, and explain your question so that person would understand it. $\endgroup$ – Guut Boy Dec 18 '14 at 20:07
  • $\begingroup$ Well its a security protocol, i dont know any better way to explain it. Its quite similar to this crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/11609/… $\endgroup$ – Bimal Dec 18 '14 at 20:16
  • $\begingroup$ @GuutBoy : $\;\;\;$ The arrows mean sends to. $\:$ X(A) means the adversary while pretending to be A. $\hspace{.58 in}$ $\endgroup$ – user991 Dec 18 '14 at 20:31
0
$\begingroup$

I think that this notation "$(A,N_X,T_B),K_{BS}$" isn't correct and must be transcripted as "$(A,N_X,T_B).K_{BS}$", which could be interpreted as the resulting cipherText of "$(A,N_X,T_B)$ under the Key $K_{BS}$". Under these conditions, we could try to understand that the attacker X begin by impersonating A, by sending to B the plainText $(A,N_X)$

  • X: Impersonating A: X(A) -> $(A,N_X)$
  • B: Ask the Server to generate a shared key for A and B, But the message is intecepted by the Attacker who doesn't know the Master Key $K_{BS}$
  • The attacker then return back the initial cipherText to B, who can easilly decrypt as he knows its shared Key $K_{BS}$ with the trusted third part.

But there is a problem, this protocol doesn't work, because there is no generation of shared Key by the Server for A and B, and then B after checking the existence of Nonce and TimeStamp, and the absence of shared Key, must logically abort the session, under the assumption that a master Key is never and NEVER send in a plainText.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.