This question already has an answer here:
Firstly, bear with me, I'm relatively new to cryptography. In a recent static analysis scan of our application, one of the findings complained that we are using ECB:
A mode of operation of a block cipher is an algorithm that describes how to repeatedly apply a cipher's single-block operation to securely transform amounts of data larger than a block. Some of the modes of operation include ECB (Electronic Codebook), CBC (Cipher Block Chaining) and CFB (Cipher Feedback). ECB mode is inherently weak, because it results in the same ciphertext for identical blocks of plaintext. CBC mode does not have this weakness, making it the superior choice.
We are using ECB with RSA. Our understanding is that RSA doesn't support anything other than ECB as it doesn't permit a block size bigger than the size of the key's modulus, and therefore would only ever encrypt a single block (or throw an exception if breaching block size). Our suspicion therefore is that the static code analysis tool is searching for 'ECB' in our code base irregardless of the crypto algorithm used.
Given our choice of an RSA crypto algorithm, is there an inherent weaknesses using ECB mode?