2
$\begingroup$

As min entropy of a random variable provides the maximum probability of getting the desired realization of the random variable, which is the most conservative way of measuring the uncertainty of outcomes. Min entropy analysis is required to bound the characteristics of the attacker's perceived observation from the output of the PRNG.

$\endgroup$

closed as unclear what you're asking by Squeamish Ossifrage, AleksanderRas, yyyyyyy, e-sushi, tylo Sep 30 at 23:19

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ Are you trying to measure it by observing output or by analyzing the PRNG? $\endgroup$ – bmm6o Mar 8 '16 at 2:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't see how this can work. You can't even distinguish a good PRNG from a true random source, so an entropy estimate has to grow without bound as more output is seen. $\endgroup$ – bmm6o Mar 8 '16 at 5:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You don't even need a calculation: It's 0. $\endgroup$ – CodesInChaos Mar 8 '16 at 8:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @CodesInChaos To my annoyance and everyone's on going confusion, no one has sufficiently either equated nor differentiated between cryptographic entropy, information entropy and Kolmogorov complexity. For instance your above comment regarding H(PRNG) = 0 is diametrically opposite to bmm60's linked accepted answer, and I believe Shannon's notion of entropy... $\endgroup$ – Paul Uszak May 25 '17 at 22:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PaulUszak Since this is "cryptography StackExhchange", it's safe to assume that when we talk about entropy, we are talking about cryptographic entropy. I hope that helps lifting your (quote) "on going confusion". $\endgroup$ – e-sushi Sep 29 at 10:42

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.