Based on a lot of reading here on crypto.stackexchange.com and around the web, it seems like AES in CBC Mode is totally unsecure if no defense is provided for oracle padding attack. And it’s not just AES, any crypto algorithm that uses CBC mode is totally unsecure if no defense is provided for padding oracle attacks. There are even step by step videos of how to recover plain text from CBC mode ciphers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-4mmc7frR4
All of this kinda blows my mind though given that Wikipedia says that the original padding oracle attack was published in 2002 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padding_oracle_attack If that is the case, how can it be that AES256CBC is often touted as strong modern encryption without mentioning that implementations lacking proper HMAC validation (Encrypt-Then-MAC), or some other padding oracle defense, are actually not secure at all? It kinda blows my mind if I’m understanding this correctly. Am I understanding this correctly?