7
$\begingroup$

I had the following questions -

  1. Concerning generating sequences of bits $\textbf{x} = ( x_{0},x_{1}, ... , x_{n-1})$ where the $x_{i} \in \{0,1\}$ are considered coefficients of a polynomial in $\gamma$ (i.e. a polynomial of form $x_{0} + x_{1}\gamma^{1} + ... + x_{n-a}\gamma^{n-1}$) where $\gamma$ is the root of a polynomial $ \Lambda(\gamma) = c_{0} + c_{1}\gamma + ... + c_{n}\gamma^{n} = 0$, $c_{i} \in \{0,1\}$ (i.e. $\textbf{x}$ is an element in a Galois extension), I understand that all the elements of this extension (i.e all possible n bit binary strings) can be generated through the relation $\textbf{x}_{j} = \gamma \textbf{x}_{j-1} \textbf{mod} \space \Lambda(\gamma)$ for correct choice of $\Lambda(\gamma)$, the "period" of this generator is $2^{n} - 1$ after which the recurrence relation "wraps around" the ring and generates the first element over. This is described on page 11 here. If we consider $k$ bit subsequences of this $n$ bit string, is it possible to derive the period for a such a subsequence?

  2. Is there a reference that concretely describes how to go from a construction above based on arithmetic in the field extension to the familiar Galois LFSR as described here?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ your notation following "can be generated through the relation" is strange. Does it uniquely define the vector x_j given the fector x_{j-1} and the polynomial \Lambda? $\endgroup$
    – kodlu
    Feb 26 '17 at 0:31
  • $\begingroup$ @kodlu there is a actually a mistake in the way that I have stated the recurrence relation, it should be stated as $\textbf{x}_{j} = \gamma\textbf{x}_{j-1} \textbf{mod} \space \Lambda(\gamma)$ - what this implies is that all elements in a quotient ring of form $\mathbb{F}_{2}[x]/<f(x)>$ where $f(x)$ is primitive (and of degree $n$) can be generated through this relation, I can post some SageMath code to illustrate this if needed $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '17 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ So for the purpose of this example, the $\textbf{x}_{j}$ are simply elements in the quotient ring (and these elements can be represented as n - bit strings) $\endgroup$ Feb 26 '17 at 18:00
4
$\begingroup$

Although I cannot speak to the first part of your question, I can answer the second part. Also, I have never seen a formal explanation of how to map polynomials to a LFSR. In retrospect, I honestly do not know if the polynomials that I have been given were picked because it was known that they would map to circuits, but here is how I do it.

As our example, we will start with the irreducible polynomial used in AES:

$$P(x)=x^8+x^4+x^3+x+1$$

I drop the $+1$, which is the $x^0$ term. This gives me 8 total flip flops: $x^8,x^7,x^6,x^5,x^4,x^3,x^2,x^1$. Due to the form of $P(x)$, I expect XOR feedback taps after $x^8,x^4,x^3,x^1$, which tap $x^8$ becomes just a feedback line as it goes to nothing. The resulting circuit is:

AES LFSR

In the circuit above, the data moves to the left from the right. Taking the initial condition for AES as 0x01, we get the logic of:

01: 0x01
02: 0x02
03: 0x04
04: 0x08
05: 0x10
06: 0x20
07: 0x40
08: 0x80
09: 0x1b
10: 0x36
11: 0x6c
12: 0xd8
13: 0xab
14: 0x4d

This method has worked every time that I have implemented a LFSR as an irreducible polynomial. The first time I looked at the problem was with a simple polynomial and the answer was just "obvious". I carried that system forward to ever other time and so far, so good.

Additions, comments and a proper method would be welcome.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.