3
$\begingroup$

I am not sure whether this is common sense, but I really don't know what this $c$ means in an equivalent sign, from Lindell's How to Simulate It:

$$\big\{(S_1(1^n, x, f_1(x,y)), f(x,y))\big\}\stackrel{c}{\equiv} \big\{(\mathsf{view}^\pi_1(x,y,n),\mathsf{output}^\pi(x,y,n))\big\}_{x,y,n}$$ $$\big\{(S_2(1^n, x, f_2(x,y)), f(x,y))\big\}\stackrel{c}{\equiv} \big\{(\mathsf{view}^\pi_2(x,y,n),\mathsf{output}^\pi(x,y,n))\big\}_{x,y,n}$$

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ The paragraph introducing the notation (bottom of page 3) talks about computationally indistinguishability, so I assume that's what it means. $\endgroup$ – CodesInChaos Oct 23 '17 at 13:37
11
$\begingroup$

To quote the paper

Two probability ensembles... are said to be computationally indistinguishable, denoted $X\stackrel{c}{\equiv}Y$, if...

This is found in section 2.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ oops, I guess I should not hurry when reading a paper. $\endgroup$ – xtt Oct 23 '17 at 13:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.