1
$\begingroup$

This may be easy, but I'm struggling to find a reasonable solution now.

Alice wants to send data to Bob. The data that Alice wants to send has been verified by Carl in some way, even though Carl has not seen the data. Anyway, given the data, Carl is able to recognize if it's the original data shown by Alice.

Bob receives the data, but now he maliciously claims that he did NOT receive the data.

How can Alice prove that he sent the data, and also keep the data secret from Carl or other parties?

Which real world tool (encryption, service, etc.) can Alice use?

1) It's not enough to prove to have sent something, Alice should be able to show that she sent exactly the data verified by Carl.

2) It's not allowed to use trusted third parties other than Carl. But Carl cannot explicitly see the data.

3) It's enough to prove that Alice sent the data, it's not needed to prove that Bob received.

4) It's not important if the data is encrypted or not. Realistically it will be.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is it really enough to prove you have sent the data, or do you need to prove that Bob received the data? $\endgroup$ – mikeazo Feb 13 '18 at 15:57
  • $\begingroup$ Just that you sent the data, but if you are able to prove even more it's welcome! $\endgroup$ – Rexcirus Feb 13 '18 at 16:39
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think this answers your question, but if you don't know about blind signatures you should. $\endgroup$ – Luis Casillas Feb 13 '18 at 22:22
  • $\begingroup$ also, a proof that data was sent may not prove that it was received. do you allow a third party, trusted by both? $\endgroup$ – kodlu Feb 14 '18 at 1:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, Carl can be a trusted third party by both. Alice's job is to send the data, so for her it's enough to prove that. $\endgroup$ – Rexcirus Feb 14 '18 at 8:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.