It will happen immediately, because you just posted your password to the internet, where the adversary is watching.
On the other hand, if you can describe the procedure you used to generate it, we can quantify the adversary's probability, knowing only the procedure and not the specific outcome, of guessing the password in one trial. From there one can quantify the expected cost of an attack that finds it, or the number of trials to find it with any prescribed probability.
For example, if you picked it uniformly at random out of a hat containing
7okufZ308@lB$^KTINX1NWbpdw6rkysxv@giMW5jgI#ZaX*#YwloT3Y$*c*2qVCW
aqfSLH4)K{*zDH:$t6(G^alcSEN\Tbc#8X)W3P[whp%kC@Kn>T#.Q8BQ6=q+![/>
D%]Auqkuel:W4l(/YqBuXSTx7Oh.0]Wq"jly>["t?8wVmUnR+ivCS?<)}+P=-:1N
I am the very model of a modern major passphrase
then the adversary has a 1/4 probability of getting it right in the first trial, and the expected number of trials before the adversary will get it right is 2.
I recommend picking it uniformly at random out of a hat containing at least $2^{128}$ possibilities.
For example, you could flip a coin 128 times and use the outcome as a seed for a CSPRNG from which you sample octets, rejecting those that do not encode graphic characters in US-ASCII, until you have collected 64 of them.
That's not a very efficient use of the password space, though: the adversary's most efficient attack is probably on the 128 coin flip outcomes rather than on the password. So you could safely bring your password down to 20 US-ASCII characters.
Alternatively, if you want it to be more memorable, you could pick a sequence of 10 words independently and uniformly at random out of a list of 7776 of them, with the help of diceware and a standard household appliance, or with the same rejection sampling technique on a CSPRNG if your name is not Raphael Weldon.
Note that for a uniform distribution on $2^{128}$ possible passwords to be safe against multi-target attacks, you must be sure to combine your password with a hefty salt. Otherwise, or if you are concerned about quantum computers, it may be prudent to double these numbers (256 coin flips, 40 US-ASCII characters, 20 diceware words) to bring it up to $2^{256}$ equiprobable possibilities, or at least bring it up to $2^{192}$.