1
$\begingroup$

According to the attached reference, does it mean that the adversary computes $PPT(initial~input)$, $PPT(z)$ and $PPT(f_i(x',y'))$?

For example, suppose the corrupted party, in the malicious model, has inputs $x,z$ and it wants to compute $x \land y$, then the adversary's output will be:

$PPT(x)$, $PPT(z)$ and $PPT(x \land y))$. Am I right?

Note: PPT is a probabilistic polynomial-time algorithm

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It means that the adversary can perform whatever (PPT) computation it wants based on all the information it has (namely, the corrupted party's input, the adversary's auxiliary input, and the value received from the trusted party) and output the result of that computation.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is my example correct? $\endgroup$ – AmirHosein Adavoudi Sep 2 '18 at 4:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is $y$ in your example? If the adversary has only $x$ and $z$, how can it compute $x\wedge y$? $\endgroup$ – fkraiem Sep 2 '18 at 4:06
  • $\begingroup$ The honest party sends y to the corrupted party. $\endgroup$ – AmirHosein Adavoudi Sep 2 '18 at 4:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ We are here in the ideal world; the parties do not communicate with each other directly, only through the trusted party. $\endgroup$ – fkraiem Sep 2 '18 at 4:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not really. What you describe is one possibility, but there are others. The adversary can for example output $x\wedge y\wedge z$. $\endgroup$ – fkraiem Sep 2 '18 at 4:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.