4
$\begingroup$

Based on this datasheet or this patent, one of the usage of PUF is printer cartridge identification and authentication. I was wondering why printer cartridge needs identification and authentication. In other words, what is the security concept behind it?

Furthermore,

what is the required protocol for it?

which item behaves as PUF?

who sends the challenge?

who verifies the correctness of the response for the given challenge?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Could you maybe revisit your previously asked questions? Only one answer seems to have been accepted, which is strange if there are high scoring answers such as on this one. Note that answerers are not obliged to provide additional info through questions in the comments indefinitely - that may feel like blackmailing to the person that answers - even if that's not your intention. $\endgroup$
    – Maarten Bodewes
    Jan 28 '20 at 0:31
8
$\begingroup$

A company can make more money if the printers it sells only work with the cartridges they sell, which does not work if there is competition. It's cheaper to force a vendor lock-in than it is to innovate and ensure that your product holds up to the competition. All the printer's authentication does is prevent you from using cartridges made by other companies. Think of it like DRM for ink. It's just capitalism.

There is no standard protocol. Each vendor is free to implement this in their own way. Most likely it's some form of challenge-response authentication done between the cartridge and the printer.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I see, makes more sense now. Is it a common thing (or going to be common)? $\endgroup$
    – Shannon
    May 2 '19 at 5:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Shabnam It is unfortunately quite common, yes. The printer industry is plagued with this kind of thing. In fact, some Laser Jet printers actually permanently disable themselves (even if they are still working properly) after a certain number of pages are printed, forcing you to buy another. $\endgroup$
    – forest
    May 2 '19 at 5:14
  • $\begingroup$ I see. I have other questions as well. 1. About the authentication, if it is between cartridge and printer, which one sends the challenge and which one generates the response? I want to see where PUF can help. 2. Who will verify the correctness of the response if it is offline? $\endgroup$
    – Shannon
    May 2 '19 at 6:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Shabnam The cartridge authenticates itself to the printer. This means that the printer likely sends the challenge, and the cartridge replies with the response. And what do you mean by offline? Naturally if the printer is not on, it can't authenticate (or even supply power to) the cartridge. $\endgroup$
    – forest
    May 2 '19 at 7:16
  • $\begingroup$ With offline, I meant with no connection to internet (or the seller). I was assuming that the one who is authenticating, should have a table of CRP, to be able to check the response of given challenge. In addition, when a new PUF is used (new cartridge), the table should be updated. If printer is authenticating, then, how the CRP table will be updated after purchasing a new cartridge? $\endgroup$
    – Shannon
    May 2 '19 at 22:56
2
$\begingroup$

The chip user doesn't really do any PUFy stuff. PUF manipulation is not entirely deterministic, so the stochastic methods used to convert that to determinism are hidden within the bowels the ChipDNA thing.

puf

The security concept is that the PUF holds the SHA3 secret, which is simply a truly random (but fixed) bit sequence. The 'secret' can be an authentication key $(K)$ for use with the FIPS 198 keyed-hash message authentication mode (HMAC) functionality off the front page. Maxim have opted for SHA3 as the hash function. They suggest that SHA3 is better than the others?

Communications $(m)$ can be authenticated $ \operatorname{HMAC-SHA3}(K,m) $. But notice that there is no cipher component on the datasheet. The datasheet only deals with the electrical connectivity to the device. Note though that this chip only came out towards the end of last year. There mightn't be any cartridges that use it yet. Something simpler will be currently used. Security protocols and how the chip's components might be used exactly will be a trade secret for the particular printer manufacturer. We do know that "ChipDNA secure key never resides statically in registers or memory, nor does it ever leave the electrical boundary of the IC" as it's in Maxim's literature. But the chip's network ID is public, yet "The unique ROM ID is used as a fundamental input parameter for cryptographic operations and serves as an electronic serial number within the application." There's an evaluation board for this chip, so you might have to buy one and experiment.

A use case for printers of the 3D type is:-

printer

Sharing the other answer's distopian worldview, the chip also has a 17 bit down counter. This allows the cartridge to be forcibly scrapped after $2^x$ pages/metres of filament.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ my main question was about the application, not the chip. I just mentioned the data sheet, because the application was mentioned there. There is also another patent that mentions this application (I added the link to main post) $\endgroup$
    – Shannon
    May 2 '19 at 22:50
  • $\begingroup$ @Shabnam I saw your comment wanting to know about how a PUF fits in... $\endgroup$
    – Paul Uszak
    May 2 '19 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ I'm pretty sure printer cartridges don't use ChipDNA... $\endgroup$
    – forest
    May 3 '19 at 0:42
  • $\begingroup$ @forest That's probably my bit in bold then :-) $\endgroup$
    – Paul Uszak
    May 3 '19 at 1:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.