2
$\begingroup$

SP-cryptosystems Is the order of applying transformations in SP cryptosystems matter? What will change if we first apply the P-transformation and then the S-transformation? Will cryptographic strength be less? And if yes, why?

$\endgroup$
0

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Let call the Substitution by $S$ and Permutation by $P$ in the Substitution Permutation Network (SPN). Let consider an SPN block cipher with $4$ rounds where $K$ represents the $\oplus$ round key.

  • With $S$ applied first

    |KSP|KSP|KSP|KSP|

    The last $P$ has no effect on security. The attackers simply discard it. So we can consider it like;

    |KSP|KSP|KSP|KS|

  • With $P$ applied first

    |KPS|KPS|KPS|KPS|

    The initial permutation has no effect in the view of the attacker. Similarly, we can consider it with some changes in the key schedule.

    |KS|KPS|KPS|KPS|

Now we can swap K and P that will require a change in the key schedule.

|KSP|KSP|KSP|KS|

That is turned into the simplified version of S applied first. Consequently, they did not differ.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

It depends on the cryptosystem if the order of transformations matters to security.


In the example of DES, we can't quite exchange S and P as considered in the question. That's because the input of S (which is 48-bit) is wider than it's output and the input and output of P (which are 32-bit). However we can exchange P and the combination of: expansion E (which input is 32-bit and output is 48-bit), XOR with subkeys (48 bits), and S (input 48-bit, output 32-bit). Then moving P does not modify security at all, because we can obtain such modified DES from regular DES as follows: on the 64-bit input block apply IP, P-1 on both 32-bit halves, IP-1, regular DES with the unmodified key, IP-1, P on both 32-bit halves, IP.

On the other hand, there are many cases where the order of transformations matters to security. For example consider the transformations of a byte

  1. Add key byte K modulo 28
  2. Apply an 8-bit substitution S-table (such at that of AES)
  3. Subtract key byte K modulo 28

Here, order matters. Any reordering moving 2 is a disaster, since the key byte becomes immaterial to the result, which is a block cipher might remove all security.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.