1
$\begingroup$

I have to generate a signature for concatenation of multiple independent values say A | B | C. Two options are :

  1. concatenate all attributes and generate the hash. Then Sign hash.

$$ signature = Sign\big(Hash(A\mathbin\| B \mathbin\| C)\big)$$

  1. Use hash of previous value along with current value to generate the hash. Sign the generated hash.

$$ signature = Sign\big(Hash\big(Hash\big(Hash(A)\mathbin\| B) \mathbin\| C)\big)\big)\big)$$

Analogous to taking two hashes of a value, option 2 seems cryptographically strong. Kindly help in picking right practice and why?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure but i will choose the first one for performance reasons, in the case your system is high intense on CPU. In terms of crypto I think both are strong and safe. $\endgroup$ – camp0 Mar 18 at 9:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just wondering, what prevents one from splitting one value into 3 and use the second approach? If Hash is SHA-1 then the 1. can be insecure as of 2020. $\endgroup$ – kelalaka Mar 18 at 10:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.