0
$\begingroup$

I know that we need to generate a delta-set (with 256 plaintexts).

During the attack, we guess 4 bytes of round 5 key and 1 bytes of round 4 key, which allows us the byte at one position of the state at the end of round 3. If that position is balanced, then the 4-byte prediction is valid, but there are a lot of false-positives.

My problem is that there are too many false positives. No matter what delta-set I generate, all remaining 4-byte combination result in a false-positives.

How can I generate the input plaintexts to eliminate these false positives? I can't find a single implementaion of AES Square attack online, so if anyone can show me, I'd be very grateful.

Thank you.

Edit: nevermind. On average 5 delta-sets or less is needed. I just had a data-type bug (char -> unsigned int) that make the program fail to eliminate delta-set

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

In statistical attacks (such as square), if we can reduce the key space, it will be considered successful. Here, as you pointed, there are false-positives and they should be considered as correct key candidates. But the point is that the distinguisher has removed some incorrect keys and has reduced the key search space. After finding candidates for the correct key, you should do exhaustive search among them or try other attacks to even reduce the key space further! Here, choosing the plaintexts does not have that much effect on the false positive, since different keys will change the chosen set differently.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you suggest some other attacks for 5-round AES? $\endgroup$ – Duke Le Apr 19 at 7:14
  • $\begingroup$ There are lots of attacks applied on reduced-round AES. Most of them covers more rounds than 5 and can also be applied on more reduced version (less rounds than the proposed ones). Here are some examples: [link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-17401-8_20] , [link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-71039-4_7] , [link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10623-012-9697-z] $\endgroup$ – Khalesi Apr 19 at 8:28
  • $\begingroup$ Both say link unavailable/article not found :\ $\endgroup$ – Duke Le Apr 20 at 10:22
  • $\begingroup$ Corrected links: link, link and link. $\endgroup$ – Khalesi Apr 21 at 8:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.