I have seen Curve25519 and X25519, Curve448 and X448. I've seen a small note in this answer

(Historical note: Originally, X25519 was called Curve25519, but now Curve25519 just means the elliptic curve and X25519 means the cryptosystem.)

  • Is it a standard to say CurveABC is the Elliptic Curve and XABC is the cryptosystem?
  • Or, it is just a convention between the Elliptic Curve Cryptographers.
  • $\begingroup$ Note: This is an example to show how to ask a question for this broad question $\endgroup$ – kelalaka Oct 8 '20 at 15:12

It is an open standard by IETF.org

We can find the details in the mail archive of IETF, D. J. Bernstein's response;

It has become increasingly common for "Curve25519" to refer to an elliptic curve, while the original paper defined "Curve25519" as an X-coordinate DH system using that curve. "Ed25519" unambiguously refers to an Edwards-coordinate signature system using that curve.

Kenny and others in Toronto recommended changing terminology to clearly separate these three items. Let me suggest the following terminology:

  • "X25519" is the recommended Montgomery-X-coordinate DH function.
  • "Ed25519" is the recommended Edwards-coordinate signature system.
  • "Curve25519" is the underlying elliptic curve.

All relevant coordinate systems already have standard names in the literature, and I would suggest sticking to those names whenever it's necessary to discuss the coordinate systems per se: [...]

Bolds are mine.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks to Squeamish Ossifrage for directing the link. $\endgroup$ – kelalaka Oct 8 '20 at 15:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I thought before reading this answer, that X stood for the X as in DH Key eXchange, since X25519 is the cryptosystem developed using that particular curve Curve25519 !!! $\endgroup$ – Vivekanand V Oct 8 '20 at 19:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @VivekanandV Schrödinger's cat. Until the author's intent is not known all are valid :). X X-coordinate, Ed Edwards-coordinate. consistent. But revealed. The cat is living :) $\endgroup$ – kelalaka Oct 8 '20 at 19:32
  • $\begingroup$ @kelalaka thanks for the answer, it is the kind of insight I was looking for in in the broad question you linked in your comment. $\endgroup$ – ams Oct 9 '20 at 13:45
  • $\begingroup$ @ams hope you got my point. A good question has your (single or very related) problem(s), what you see here and there (wiki, or the www) then your understanding/confusion,... correct tags and a good title ( not broad one, too), then post and wait. $\endgroup$ – kelalaka Oct 9 '20 at 17:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.