I know that the first step in TLS 1.3 with modern signatures is hash the message with SHA256/SHA384/SHA512.
Do PQC signatures work the same as modern algorithms in TLS 1.3?
Cryptography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for software developers, mathematicians and others interested in cryptography. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityI know that the first step in TLS 1.3 with modern signatures is hash the message with SHA256/SHA384/SHA512.
Do PQC signatures work the same as modern algorithms in TLS 1.3?
Not necessarily; this varies from signature scheme to signature scheme. In some lattice signature schemes (e.g. FALCON) it is important not to produce two signatures for the same private key and hash value. In the case of FALCON it is therefore specified that the message be randomly salted before hashing and signing (see section 2.2.2 of the FALCON submission). Others require that the message be hashed to a particular mathematical structure and so require more hash data from XOF variants such as the SHA3 SHAKE functions. The wide range of PQC proposals for signature schemes make it impractical to do a comprehensive treatment, but if there is a particular scheme of interest more can be said.