2
$\begingroup$

I can't find relevant literature discussing three attack models of the ECC-ElGamal algorithm (CPA, CCA1, CCA2)

ECC-ElGamal algorithm: ElGamal with elliptic curves

I only know that ElGamal belongs to CPA, but I can't determine which one (CPA, CCA1 or CCA2) belongs to in the case of ElGamal on ECC.

It would be better if there is a source of relevant literature!!! Thank you very much!!

$\endgroup$
0
4
$\begingroup$

In Tsiounis and Yung's proof of the IND-CPA semantic security of El Gamal, the only assumption made is that the decisional Diffie-Hellman problem is hard. The proof transfers easily to any group where the decisional Diffie-Hellman problem is hard, including we believe (non-pairing-friendly) elliptic curve groups.

Similarly all El Gamal instantiations are trivially CCA2 attackable (given a ciphertext $(rG,rA+M)$, request a decryption of (for example) $(2rG,2(rA+M))$ to recover $2M$ and hence $M$.

As far as I know the semantic security of any instance of IND-CPA secure El Gamal under CCA1 is an open problem.

On the pairing-friendly elliptic curve point, note that for such curves there is a means of checking whether a given El Gamal encryption is an encryption of a hypothetical message e.g. to check that $(P,Q)=(rG,rA+M)$ compute the pairing of $P$ and $A$ with the pairing of $G$ and $Q-M$. If the equality of the pairing holds, then so does the equality of the encryptions. This is because the decisional Diffie-Hellman problem is soluble in these groups.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is the safety of meeting CCA better than CPA? If CCA is more secure than CPA, is it insecure to only meet CPA encryption? $\endgroup$ – Hung LI Apr 8 at 5:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.