Most hashes are built from permutations (either keyed permutations/block-cipher, as in MD5, SHA-1 and SHA-2, or unkeyed permutations as in Keccak/SHA-3 and CubeHash). A permutation is a shuffling of the inputs. Once you have a good random permutation, you can easily build a hash from it. See [Construction of One-way compression functions from block ciphers](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-way_compression_function#Construction_from_block_ciphers) on wikipedia for details.

As an analogy you can think of shuffling cards by hand (except crypto uses between $2^{128}$ and $2^{512}$ cards).

A common strategy for shuffling is going through the deck several times, performing a bunch simple operation each time. Each time of going through the deck is called a "round".

**Why do SHA-2 and SHA-3 have a smaller number of rounds?**

For a round you can either choose to do more complex, and thus expensive operations which achieve more or simpler cheaper rounds which do less. SHA-1 has simpler rounds than SHA-2 and thus needs more of them to properly mix the values.

The art of designing a symmetric primitive is achieving as much mixing as possible with as cheap as possible operations. The SHA-2 and SHA-3 are better than SHA-1 in that regard.

**Why have many rounds?**

More rounds make cryptoanalytic attacks harder but not help (much) against brute-force. In particular it increases resistance to a technique called Differential Cryptoanalysis, which is a popular technique for attacking hashes and blockciphers.

Going back to the card shuffling analogy:

You can define features of a deck, such as two specific cards being placed directly after each other. After going through the deck once, that feature might be preserved with a relatively high probability like 10%. Going through the deck multiple times the probability of a feature surviving all of them drops exponentially. So the probability of a feature being present in the final state will approach the ideal probability quickly.

In cryptoanalysis you can define similar features called "differential characteristic". One round preserves this characteristic with a certain probability. For example if a characteristic survives one round with probability $10^{-3}$, it might survive 80 rounds with probability $10^{-3 \cdot 80}= 10^{-240}$.

If you have characteristics surviving all rounds with high enough probability, that can often be exploited for finding a collision or pre-image faster. The aim using enough rounds that exploiting these shuffling flaws is more expensive than doing a brute-force attack.

*(There are a few inaccuracies in the above description, but I believe the general idea is correct.)*

**Why does SHA-1 have 80 rounds?**

More rounds increase security against cryptoanalysis. But it also decreases performance. So it's necessary to find a compromise between security and performance. The SHA-1 designers chose 80 rounds.

in hindsight, they chose a too low value, since we have since found attacks on SHA-1 that are faster than brute-force.