Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with integrity
Search options not deleted
user 53752
In a cryptographic sense, integrity means unimpaired and complete.
12
votes
Accepted
Should the identity of a sender be verified using additional means, or does a MAC suffice?
It is a recurring topic: what exactly is identity and how to prove it ? But related to your question: a MAC (correctly implemented) proves that the author of the message was in possession of the secr …
- 382