Timeline for Dice vs quantum random number generator
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2018 at 21:28 | vote | accept | Paul Uszak | ||
| Oct 12, 2018 at 21:47 | history | edited | Paul Uszak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clearing up what the dice shaker & vN are for, and how the beam splitter works.
|
| Oct 12, 2018 at 20:53 | comment | added | Paul Uszak | @kelalaka Shaker cup + von Neumann. | |
| Oct 12, 2018 at 20:46 | comment | added | kelalaka | This suggests that the toss of a symmetrical die is not a perfectly random of cource this is after throw | |
| Oct 11, 2018 at 21:55 | answer | added | Meler Lawler | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 2, 2017 at 8:15 | comment | added | daniel | I don't know why you would bring a Von Neumann extractor into this, if your dice are biased get better dice | |
| Oct 1, 2017 at 23:22 | answer | added | Elias | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 1, 2017 at 20:14 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCrypto/status/914584198572277760 | ||
| Oct 1, 2017 at 13:18 | history | edited | Paul Uszak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More cynicism and links
|
| Oct 1, 2017 at 8:42 | comment | added | user27950 | The beam splitter is snake oil. You get perfectly unpredictable random numbers by any smart card chip, which costs only a few euros. | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 23:04 | history | asked | Paul Uszak | CC BY-SA 3.0 |