Skip to main content
Cryptography

Return to Question

Tweeted twitter.com/StackCrypto/status/1088542097806970880
Name correction.
Source Link
kelalaka
kelalaka
  • 49.5k
  • 12
  • 119
  • 205

As we know, Textbook RSA is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e$e$ issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

As we know, Textbook RSA is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

As we know, Textbook RSA is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small $e$ issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

Name correction.
Source Link
edit approved Jan 24, 2019 at 8:59
DannyNiu
edit approved Jan 24, 2019 at 8:59
DannyNiu
  • 9.8k
  • 2
  • 25
  • 62

How does PKCS 1.5 solve the insecureness of RSA Textbook RSA?

As we know, RSA Textbook RSA is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

How does PKCS 1.5 solve the insecureness of RSA Textbook?

As we know, RSA Textbook is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

How does PKCS 1.5 solve the insecureness of Textbook RSA?

As we know, Textbook RSA is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.

Source Link
Davis
Davis
  • 193
  • 1
  • 4

How does PKCS 1.5 solve the insecureness of RSA Textbook?

As we know, RSA Textbook is not enough safe to use because of the following issues;

  • Guessable plaintext problem

  • Small e issue

I want to know how PKCS 1.5 solved these problems.