Are EdDSA algorithms encoded by ASN.1 DER standards?

Is it required, or widely practiced to encode a EdDSA signature as a ASN.1 Sequence? Why or why not? How should you encode a EdDSA signature? I cannot find mention of DER or ASN in the EdDSA RFC.

However, there is mention in the ECDSA RFC (as expected)

An ECDSA signature is a pair of integers. In many protocols that require a signature to be a sequence of bits (or octets), it is customary to encode the signature as an ASN.1 SEQUENCE of two INTEGER values, with DER rules.

In particular, for an instance of EdDSA on a curve $$E$$ over a field $$\mathbb F_p$$ of order $$p < 2^{b-1}$$:
• A public key is a $$b$$-bit bit string $$n \mathbin\| \underline y$$ encoding a point $$(x, y) \in E$$, where $$n$$ is 1 if $$x$$ is ‘negative’ and 0 if not, and $$\underline y$$ is the little-endian encoding of the least nonnegative integer residue of $$y \in \mathbb F_p$$. Here ‘negative’ means $$\underline x$$ is lexicographically larger than $$\underline{-x}$$.
• A signature is a $$2b$$-bit string $$\underline R \mathbin\| \underline s$$ encoding a point $$R \in E$$ like a public key, and a $$b$$-bit integer $$s$$ in little-endian encoding $$\underline s$$.