Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with related-keys
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 87477
Keys with an exploitable mathematical relationship, and the attacks they enable
2
votes
How exactly to concatenate two differential trails to form a boomerang disguisher in practice?
In this case because the trail $E_1$ begins at the stage in the cipher directly after the trail $E_0$ ends you can use $E_m$ as the identity map which preserves all differences with probability one.
T …
- 26.4k