Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with oaep
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 7262
Optimal Asymmetric Encryption Padding is a padding scheme for RSA, codifying how short plaintext is enciphered and deciphered. It has a security reduction to the RSA problem.
3
votes
1
answer
964
views
Does rsa-oaep provide or not plaintext integrity in addition to confidentiality?
My own understanding (possibly wrong of course) of RSA-OAEP encryption scheme is that it provides plaintext integrity (in addition to confidentiality) due to MGF function which for encryption operation … However in previous post on that subject, the answer indicated that no public key encryption scheme can satisfy INT-PTXT (nor INT-CTXT) requirements
So is it possible to have confirmation if rsa-oaep …
- 653
2
votes
1
answer
764
views
Is RSA encryption without padding secure with NIST Key Establishment schemes?
I understood that RSA encryption should mandate one of the two padded schemes (PKCS#1 v1.5 or OAEP) as defined in the PKCS#1 standard. …
- 653